Tuesday, January 26, 2010 at 4:03 pm UTC by David Crotty permalink
January’s issue of Cold Spring Harbor Protocols wraps up the second volume of our ongoing Emerging Model Organisms series. The idea behind the series is that technical advances have allowed for great expansion in the range of organisms used for research. Each set of articles is meant to introduce the reader to a new organism, to explain why it’s useful for laboratory research and to provide information on husbandry, genetics and genomics, and a set of basic laboratory protocols. The first set of 23 emerging model systems was collected in a laboratory manual, and the current set of 18 will soon be as well. January’s organisms are:
The Rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus): The rabbit is a valuable animal model for a variety of biomedical research areas including in vitro fertilization, early embryology and organogenesis, neurophysiology, ophthalmology, and cardiovascular research. The rabbit is also used as a model for toxicology studies and analyses of drug effects on embryo and fetal development, as well as for research involving the immune system, not to mention its common use in antibody production. Christoph Viebahn and colleagues from the University of Göttingen provide an overview of the rabbit as an experimental system, and protocols for mating and embryo isolation, dissection and fixation of embryos, embryo culture, staining and imaging, immunofluorescence, in situ hybridization, mounting, embedding and sectioning, embryo transfer, artificial insemination and cryopreservation of embryos.
Paramecium tetraurelia: Paramecium makes an interesting unicellular model, as the authors note:
Paramecium tetraurelia is a widely distributed, free-living unicellular organism that feeds on bacteria and can easily be cultured in the laboratory. Its position within the phylum Ciliophora, remote from the most commonly used models, offers an interesting perspective on the basic cellular and molecular processes of eukaryotic life. Its large size and complex cellular organization facilitate morphogenetic studies of conserved structures, such as cilia and basal bodies, as well as electrophysiological studies of swimming behavior. Like all ciliates, P. tetraurelia contains two distinct types of nuclei, the germline micronucleus (MIC) and the somatic macronucleus (MAC), which differentiate from copies of the zygotic nucleus after fertilization. The sexual cycle can be managed by controlling food uptake, allowing the study of a developmentally regulated differentiation program in synchronous cultures. Spectacular genome rearrangements occur during the development of the somatic macronucleus. Their epigenetic control by RNA-mediated homology-dependent mechanisms, which might underlie long-known cases of non-Mendelian inheritance, provides evolutionary insight into the diversity of small RNA pathways involved in genome regulation. Being endowed with two alternative modes of sexual reproduction (conjugation and autogamy), P. tetraurelia is ideally suited for genetic analyses, and the recent sequencing of its macronuclear genome revealed one of the largest numbers of genes in any eukaryote. Together with the development of new molecular techniques, including complementation cloning and an easily implemented technique for reverse genetics based on RNA interference (RNAi), these features make P. tetraurelia a very attractive unicellular model.
Eric Meyer and colleagues from the CNRS have written an overview of P tetraurelia as a model system, and protocols for maintaining cell lines, mass culture, gene silencing, DNA microinjection, immunocytochemistry, and fluorescence in situ hybridization.
We have some new organisms in the works for Volume 3, but would welcome your suggestions.
Posted in Bioinformatics/Genomics, Cell Biology, Developmental Biology, General, Laboratory Organisms, Molecular Biology | No Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. | TrackBack URI
Add to:
Del.icio.us
Digg
Technorati
Blinklist
Furl
reddit
Tuesday, January 19, 2010 at 4:07 pm UTC by David Crotty permalink
Metagenomics, the study of DNA isolated from naturally occurring populations and samples, is rapidly growing. Improvements to cloning and sequencing techniques are allowing researchers to study organism in environmental samples, and new knowledge of species interactions and community dynamics is emerging. The identification of microorganisms in these samples is of vital importance to their interpretation. In the January issue of Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, Annelie Wendeberg of the Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research presents a protocol for Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization for the Identification of Environmental Microbes. The methods described allow the phylogenetic identification of microorganisms in environmental samples (e.g., water and sediments) by means of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes followed by signal amplification with catalyzed reporter deposition (CARD). The protocol is one of January’s featured articles, and like all featured articles in Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, it is freely accessible to subscribers and non-subscribers alike.
Posted in Bioinformatics/Genomics, Cell Biology, General, Genetics, Laboratory Organisms, Molecular Biology | No Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. | TrackBack URI
Add to:
Del.icio.us
Digg
Technorati
Blinklist
Furl
reddit
Monday, January 11, 2010 at 2:44 pm UTC by David Crotty permalink
As the cost of sequencing declines, more and more laboratories are extending their research into metagenomics. The Metagenomics RAST Server (MG-RAST) is one of the leading tools for metagenomic analysis, and in January’s issue of Cold Spring Harbor Protocols, Folker Meyer and colleagues from the Argonne National Laboratory present a detailed set of instructions for using this web-based open source system, Using the Metagenomics RAST Server (MG-RAST) for Analyzing Shotgun Metagenomes. Shotgun metagenomics creates millions of fragments of short DNA reads, which are meaningless unless analyzed appropriately. MG-RAST offers a unique suite of tools for analyzing these data sets. After dereplication and quality control, fragments are mapped against a comprehensive nonredundant database (NR). Phylogenetic and metabolic reconstructions are computed from the set of hits against the NR. The resulting data are made available for browsing, download, and most importantly, comparison against a comprehensive collection of public metagenomes.
Posted in General | No Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. | TrackBack URI
Add to:
Del.icio.us
Digg
Technorati
Blinklist
Furl
reddit
Monday, January 4, 2010 at 9:21 am UTC by David Crotty permalink
The enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay is considered by many to be the gold standard for monitoring cellular immune responses. The method is highly sensitive, quantitative, easy to use and amenable to high throughput screening. Until recently, the ELISPOT assay has been limited to the characterization of only one single effector molecule. Since the maintenance of both IFN-gamma and IL-2 by pathogen-specific T cells has been linked to a more favorable clinical outcome in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) and Leishmania infections, an ELISPOT assay able to characterize both these effector molecules would be helpful for monitoring immune responses to certain infectious agents. Nicole Bernard and colleagues from the McGill University Health Centre present a protocol for Dual-Color ELISPOT Assay for the Simultaneous Detection of IL-2 and/or IFN-gamma Secreting T Cells in the January issue of Cold Spring Harbor Protocols. As interest in multifunctional T-cell monitoring in human diseases grows, this method is likely to be extensively used. The protocol is one of January’s featured articles, and is freely available to subscribers and non-subscribers alike.
Posted in Antibodies, Cell Biology, General, Immunology, Proteins and Proteomics | No Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. | TrackBack URI
Add to:
Del.icio.us
Digg
Technorati
Blinklist
Furl
reddit
Monday, January 4, 2010 at 9:15 am UTC by David Crotty permalink
I wanted to point out an excellent thought-provoking article by my Scholarly Kitchen colleague Michael Clarke, titled Why Hasn’t Scientific Publishing Been Disrupted Already? I know many readers here are interested in the future of scientific communication, and Clarke makes some interesting arguments for why journals are likely to persist.
Posted in General | No Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post. | TrackBack URI
Add to:
Del.icio.us
Digg
Technorati
Blinklist
Furl
reddit